judiciary

share

Examples
judiciary's examples

  • Page not found. You will be re-directed to the home page in 10 If you are not re-directed you may click this link: http://www.courts.mo.gov. — “Missouri Judiciary Home Page”, courts.mo.gov
  • Connecticut General Assembly Official Legislative Site for Bills, Legislation, Statutes, and sessional activity. Visit our site to find all your legislative information The Joint Committee on Judiciary has cognizance of all matters relating to courts, judicial procedures, criminal law, probate. — “Connecticut General Assembly - Joint Committee on Judiciary”, cga.ct.gov
  • The judiciary branch of state government includes four levels of courts. The highest court is called the Court of Appeals. The intermediate appeals court is called the Court of Special Appeals. The Circuit Court in each county and in Baltimore. — “Maryland Judiciary”, courts.state.md.us
  • Includes information about the courts and links to the U.S. Supreme Court, Courts of Appeals, District Courts, and Bankruptcy Courts. For the latest on Judiciary news and happenings, read The Third Branch, the newsletter of the federal courts. — “United States Federal Judiciary”, uscourts.gov
  • Courts and judicial system of the State of Indiana Today's Court of Appeals Opinions. Today's Tax Court Opinions. Indiana Rules of Court. Law Library Online Catalog. Indiana Courts. www.IN.gov/judiciary. — “courts.IN.gov :: Indiana Courts Official Website”, in.gov
  • Definition of judiciary in the Legal Dictionary - by Free online English dictionary and encyclopedia. What is judiciary? Meaning of judiciary as a legal term. What does judiciary mean in law?. — “judiciary legal definition of judiciary. judiciary synonyms”, legal-
  • Official agency for research and continuing education. Includes server links. — “Federal Judicial Center”, fjc.gov
  • The official website of the Hawaii State Judiciary. Provides access to case records, forms, contact information and Appellate Court opinions. — “Hawaii State Judiciary”, courts.state.hi.us
  • Home Page of the Massachusetts Judicial Branch. Welcome to the Massachusetts Judicial Branch. This site includes the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the courts, judicial profiles, press releases, recent court opinions, and a variety of other useful information. — “The Massachusetts Court System”, mass.gov
  • Jurisdiction over measures relating to law, courts and judges, Constitutional amendments, immigration, patents and trademarks, interstate compacts, and apportionment of Representatives. Includes information on members, legislation, schedule,. — “House Judiciary Committee”, judiciary.house.gov
  • WELCOMING SPEECH BY HIS LORDSHIP AUGUSTINE RAMADHANI CHIEF JUSTICE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ON THE OCCASION OF THE OPENING OF THE JUDICIARY WEBSITE. It is a great honour to me to have this opportunity to open the Judiciary website in the administration of Justice in Tanzania. — “The Judiciary of Tanzania”, judiciary.go.tz
  • Judiciary Committee Website Awarded 2010 "Gold Mouse" The Senate Judiciary Committee was In February 1864, the Judiciary Committee approved a resolution, which ultimately became. — “Senate Judiciary Committee”, judiciary.senate.gov
  • Definition of judiciary in the Online Dictionary. Meaning of judiciary. Pronunciation of judiciary. Translations of judiciary. judiciary synonyms, judiciary antonyms. Information about judiciary in the free online English dictionary and. — “judiciary - definition of judiciary by the Free Online”,
  • Copyrighted © 2001 - New Jersey Judiciary. About NJ Courts. Judiciary Mission Statement. NJ Courts Overview. Supreme Court. Appellate Judiciary Times Newsletter. Legislative News. Notices to the Bar. Future Opinions For Release. Press Releases. — “New Jersey Judiciary”, judiciary.state.nj.us
  • judiciary n. , pl. , -ies . The judicial branch of government. A system of courts of law for the administration of justice. — “judiciary: West's Encyclopedia of American Law (Full Article”,
  • The judiciary (also known as the judicial system or judicature) is the system of courts The judiciary also provides a mechanism for the resolution of disputes. — “Judiciary - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia”,
  • Welcome to the Wisconsin court system. The courts of our state belong not to the lawyers Supreme Court accepts two Walworth County cases. November 17, 2010 - The Wisconsin Supreme. — “Wisconsin Court System”, wicourts.gov
  • Judiciary definition, the judicial branch of government. See more. — “Judiciary | Define Judiciary at ”,
  • The judiciary comprises of Magistrates and Judges who preside in the Magistrates Court, The judiciary is reformed on the Administration of Justice Decree 2009 (No 9). — “Judiciary of Fiji”, judiciary.gov.fj
  • about the courts. Mission. History. more supreme court. Justices. Clerk of Court. Court Calendar. superior court. Judges. Clerk of P.O. Box 502165 Saipan, MP 96950 | Telephone (670) 236-9700 | Fascimile (670) 236-9702 | Email @justice.gov.mp © 2008. — “Judiciary”, justice.gov.mp

Images
related images for judiciary

  • at the National Judiciary School To download right click on the picture and select Save Picture As Note Please credit USAID and the photographer in any re use of this photo
  • SenateJudiciaryCommittee050315 jpg
  • judiciary4 jpg
  • Kauai Judiciary Complex Completion Date Marriott s Waiohai Beach Club Completion Date
  • invitation for Bid IFB 08 06 Judiciary of Guam Phone 671 475 3393 3212
  • LR508Judiciary jpg
  • Rafsanjani left conferring with Sadeq Larijani during the inauguration ceremony The ceremony was attended by President Mahmoud Ahmadinjad Majlis Speaker Ali Larijani and a
  • lgfr 01 jpg
  • SABA diversity in the judiciary event jpg
  • Click on plate for larger image December 2003 expiration on Rhode Island Judiciary license plate Image sent by
  • News Student Judiciary creates panel to review fund case
  • Visuals In Islamabad a shopkeeper has unique way to shun borrowers off we all don t see restoration of judiciary any time soon The crisis is still on = Image Courtesy Khabrain
  • Unofficial Scribe s Notes Webcast via payphone Picture 1 2
  • judiciary0703 jpg
  • The Federal Judiciary
  • Judiciary jpg
  • judiciary jpg
  • il sera question plus tard de mésentente du cabinet du greffier on reparlera aussi de ce lieu promis mais samedi soir l issue ne faisait plus de doute L article complet C EST PAR LA PS L auteur signale que Chantal Peyranne n a pas fait de relecture orthographique et que de nombreuses fautes d orthographe persistent Il s en excuse
  • Police reports supplied by update person wishes to remain anonymous Document 1 | Document 2 | Document 3 | Document 4
  • Because of the Supremacy Clause the Constitutional clause that allows the federal government authority in disputes between states and the federal government Implied Powers and
  • FJRI President testifying during a workshop on Expert Testimony before the House Civil Justice Courts Policy Committee March 19 2009
  • Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
  • Judiciary leaving the chapel
  • Targu Mures The Judiciary Hall
  • Police reports supplied by update person wishes to remain anonymous Document 1 | Document 2 | Document 3 | Document 4 In the first half of 2008 XX provided me with several documents that accused a number of persons of child abuse some of whom
  • 229404 judiciary tightrope jpg
  • invitation for Bid IFB 08 07 Judiciary of Guam Phone 671 475 3175 3393
  • 227 Federal Judiciary Building jpg
  • lgfr 04 jpg
  • lgfr 03 jpg
  • Judiciary is responsible CJ
  • Madisonville Louisiana 985 966 5013 I was called Monday afternoon by a friend close to the Judiciary Commission and told that Green was going to be allowed to complete his term but they considered him a lame duck An
  • lgfr 02 jpg
  • Enlarge Image
  • the public The Tribune of 10 January 2002 published a letter on the matter from Stan under the heading Why fig tree address is important and we republish it here It stands on its own Please click here MATTHEW MITCHELL CASE
  • Solutions will perform a full building assessment to GSA Level 4 requirements prepare a detailed report with recommendations anticipated budget costs and a schedule for implementation IAMP Institute of Allied Medical Professions Location Uniondale NY
  • Invitation for Bid IFB 08 05 Judiciary of Guam Phone 671 475 3175 3393
  • Police reports supplied by update person wishes to remain anonymous Document 1 | Document 2 | Document 3 | Document 4 In the first half of 2008 XX provided me with several documents that accused a number of persons of child abuse some of whom had already
  • License this photo Complete information on licensing for editorial commercial or other uses
  • Request for Proposal 08 01 Judiciary of Guam Phone 671 475 3393 3175

Videos
related videos for judiciary

  • David Drummond testifies at Senate Judiciary Committee (1) (Part 1 of 2) David Drummond, Google's Senior Vice President of Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer, testifies before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights at a July 15, 2008 hearing about competition and the Google-Yahoo! ad agreement. Topics of discussion include how the agreement benefits users, advertisers, and publishers, and the competitive nature of the online advertising business.
  • Kucinich Testifies Before HJC for Bush Impeachment Dennis Kucinich testifies before House Judiciary Committee for Bush impeachment 7-25-08
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt30 Part 30 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Second part of Senator Schumer 's second round of questions to Alberto Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" During this portion of the hearing, Schumer asks Gonzales, "Who sent you (to Ashcroft's hospital bed?" and Gonzales launches into an obviously prepared script that doesn't answer the question. Transcript of this part of the questioning: SCHUMER: The facts have come out that all visitors were barred by her. OK. Next, do you have documents in your possession reflecting the transfer of power or authority from Ashcroft to Comey? GONZALES: I do have them now, yes. SCHUMER: You didn't have them then? GONZALES: I don't recall having -- personally having them. There is some question, as I understand it, about whether they came to the White House and who at the White House had them. But, again, I'll just... SCHUMER: Counsel -- wouldn't the counsel have gotten such documents? GONZALES: I would think so, yes. SCHUMER: So you probably had them. Is that -- would that be fair? GONZALES: I would say that they may have come in. I have no recollection of that, Senator. SCHUMER: Could you go through your records and produce for this committee any documents in your possession at that time or in your offices -- the Office of Council's possession at the time? GONZALES: I'd be happy to take that back ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt18 Part 18 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Chuck Schumer's first round of questions to Alberto Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: SCHUMER: I'd like to just pick up where Senator Specter left off, about the TSP program. Just a few preliminaries. First, I take it that there was just one program that the president confirmed in 2005. There was not more than one. GONZALES: He confirmed one, yes, intelligence activity. Yes, one program. SCHUMER: Thank you. OK. Now, you -- and you've repeatedly referred to the, quote, "program," that the president confirmed in December 2005. Let me just -- I'm going to put up a chart here. Here's what you said before this committee on February 6th of 2006. You said, quote, "There has not been any serious disagreement about the program the president has confirmed. With respect to what the president has confirmed, I do not believe that these DOJ officials that you were identifying had concerns about this program." This was in reference to a question I asked you, "Was there any dissent here?" This was before Comey came to testify. It was in February. But we had some thoughts that maybe that happened. And now, of course, we know from Jim Comey that virtually the entire leadership of the Justice Department was prepared to resign over concerns about a ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt28 Part 28 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Ben Cardin's second round of questions to Alberto Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: WHITEHOUSE: Senator Cardin? CARDIN: Thank you. I want to just raise one -- come back to the concerns I have about selective release of information. Our responsibility is to do the oversight to make sure that things are done according to law, that you're held accountable, and that we carry our responsibilities as a legislative branch of government. We need a complete record in order to do that. And my concern is we get selective release of information. And today you released some information concerning the congressional advice to you in regards to an intelligence briefing at the White House. My understanding is that the details of those types of briefings are classified information that can be released by the president. You released information concerning the advice given to you by the congressmen who are there, the senators who were there. We don't know who was there, we don't have those details. We're not entitled to the details if I understand correctly the ground rules for these types of briefings. So can you just -- first of all was a conscientious decision made to release that information by the White House? GONZALES: I had -- no, there was no ...
  • House Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Torture Ex-Navy Instructor Malcolm Nance and Air Force Reserve Colonel Steve Kleinman testify before the House Judiciary Subcommittee about waterboarding and torture, November 8, 2007
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt23 Part 23 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Ted Kennedy's questions to Alberto Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: KENNEDY: Thank you. Thank very much, Mr. Chairman. Thank you. Welcome, General. Just to come back for a moment or two on the issue of torture, as you are aware the executive order has been published. It was published on July 20th, 2007. Did the department review the executive order... GONZALES: Yes. KENNEDY: ... (inaudible) put out? GONZALES: As a matter of custom we would do that, yes. KENNEDY: OK. And did you produce any memoranda or any other documents assessing the legality of the order? GONZALES: Senator, I don't know. We certainly provided advice, yes, about the order. I can't tell you whether or not we provided a legal document... (CROSSTALK) KENNEDY: Can you make those available to the committee? Can you make those available about the department's ***ysis of... GONZALES: I will take that back and see what we can do, Senator. KENNEDY: In the particular document, at paragraph E, it mentions certain activities by definition that violate human decency. It specifies those. It says in paragraph E, "outrageous acts of personal abuse, done for the purpose of humiliating or degrading the individual in a manner so serious that any reasonable person, considering the ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt3 Part 3 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Ranking member Senator Arlen Specter's opening statement. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: SPECTER: Let me move quickly through a series of questions -- there's a lot to cover -- starting with the issue that Mr. Comey raises. You said, quote, "There has not been any serious disagreement about the program." Mr. Comey's testimony was that Mr. Gonzales began to discuss why they were there, to seek approval, and he then says, quote, "I was very upset. I was angry. I thought I had just witnessed an effort to take advantage of a very sick man." SPECTER: First of all, Mr. Attorney General, what credibility is left for you when you say there's no disagreement and you're party to going to the hospital to see Attorney General Ashcroft under sedation to try to get him to approve the program? GONZALES: The disagreement that occurred, and the reason for the visit to the hospital, Senator, was about other intelligence activities. It was not about the terrorist surveillance program that the president announced to the American people. Now, I would like the opportunity... SPECTER: Mr. Attorney General, do you expect us to believe that? GONZALES: Well, may I have the opportunity to talk about another very important meeting in connection with the hospital visit that ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt12 Part 12 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Ben Cardin questions Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: CARDIN: Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. General Gonzales, I want to return to the US attorney issue, because I think there is a great deal of concern and a lot of questions that have not been answered, and I want to give you a chance to do that. You have offered conflicting testimonies as to who was responsible for the firing of the US attorneys. We still don't know. And Senator Feinstein's questions really weren't answered. We don't know who was responsible for a particular name ending up being fired. So let me just go over the US attorneys who were fired and the concern that I think Americans have that your commitment to make sure the Department of Justice is not politicized is exactly what happened with the US attorneys that were fired. Mr. Iglesias was involved in New Mexico as US attorney investigating certain Democratic -- Democrats. The prominent Republicans were very unhappy with the timing of that investigation, which I think has now become public. So there was a concern that the US attorney wasn't doing what the local political establishment -- Republican establishment -- wanted. In Nevada, there was an investigation of the Republican governor by the US attorney ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Sotomayor Watch more at .
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt13 Part 13 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Chuck Grassley questions Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: LEAHY: Thank you. Senator Grassley was actually the first one here, but is, like all of us, juggling more than one committee assignment. I'll recognize him now. GRASSLEY: Thank you. I was sharing my time with the Finance Committee. Mr. Chairman, I have a list of outstanding requests and documents and information from the FBI, and I'm going to ask that this be put in the record and I'm going to refer to it. LEAHY: Without objection, all the material will be part of the record. And also without objection, opening statements by various senators who have asked be put in the record will be placed in the record as though read. GRASSLEY: Thank you. Mr. Attorney General, the request for documents and information relate to the oversight involving Special Agent Jane Turner, Special Agent Cecilia Woods, the Amerask (ph) investigation and e-mails relating to exigent letters that we detailed in the national security letters report. I continue to wait for these responses, some of them months overdue. And as the FBI is a component of the Department of Justice and I'm doing it here at this hearing, to ask if you would personally ensure the prompt delivery of all information requested ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt2 Part 2 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Continuation of Chairman Senator Patrick Leahy's opening statement. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: LEAHY:When the attorney general replaced Mr. Graves with Bradley Schlozman, the person pushing the lawsuit, that case was filed and ultimately, of course, was thrown out of court. LEAHY: Once in place in Missouri, though, Mr. Schlozman also brought indictments on the eve of a closely contested election, despite a Justice Department policy -- longstanding policy not to do so. This is what happens when a responsible prosecutor is replaced by one considered a, quote, "loyal Bushie," for partisan political purposes. Mr. Schlozman also bragged about hiring ideological soul-mates. Monica Goodling, likewise, admitted crossing the line when she used a political litmus test for career prosecutors and immigration judges. And rather than keep federal law enforcement above politics, this administration is more intent on placing its actions above the law. The attorney general admitted recently in a video for Justice employees that injecting politics into the department's hiring is unacceptable. But is he committed to corrective action and rooting out the partisanship in federal law enforcement? His lack of independence and tendency to act as if he were the ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt1 Part 1 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Chairman Senator Patrick Leahy opens the hearing (Leahy's statement is continued in Part 2). 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: LEAHY: Good morning. I'd ask those who are standing in the back to show courtesy to the people who are -- who stood in line to be here to sit down. Everybody is welcome here who's here. But I would expect all those who are in here for the hearing to respect the rights of everybody who's here and to not stand and block those who are trying to watch the proceedings and have a right to be here. Three months ago, when Attorney General Gonzales last appeared before this committee, I said that the Department of Justice was experiencing a crisis of leadership perhaps unrivaled during its history. Unfortunately, the crisis has not abated. Until there is independence and transparency and accountability, the crises will continue. The attorney general's lost the confidence of the Congress and the American people. But through oversight we hope to restore balance and accountability to the executive branch. The Department of Justice must be restored to being worthy of its name. It should not be reduced to another political arm of the White House; it was never intended to be that. Trust and confidence of the American people in federal law ...
  • Activists suggest judiciary to be kept out of Lokpal ambit Activists who have gathered to discuss the proposed Lok Pal Bill feel that the higher judiciary should be kept out of the ambit of the to-be-drafted anti-corruption Bill. www.istream.in
  • Stephen Colbert testifies at House Judiciary This is the raw stream question and answer portion of the hearing on agricultural jobs. For his opening remarks in character see
  • House Judiciary Committee hearing - Dan Arment opening statement A clip from the 2010 House Judiciary Committee hearing entitled "Legal Issues Relating to Football Head Injuries, Part II" following up an October 28th hearing in Washington where lawmakers questioned NFL football commissioner Roger Goodell about the league's approach to concussions. Dan Arment is the president of Riddell. This is his opening statement.
  • Judiciary hearing on Elena Kagan: Dr. Coburn's Remarks (Day 2)
  • Highlights of Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Sen. Webbs Criminal Justice Bill
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt26 Part 26 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse's second round of questions to Alberto Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: LEAHY: We won't have to recess unless the attorney general wants a break. I'll turn the gavel over to Senator Whitehouse. WHITEHOUSE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. WHITEHOUSE: Mr. Gonzales, let me just follow up briefly on what Senator Feingold was saying, because I'm also a member of both committees. And I have to tell you, I have the exact same perception that he does. And that is that if there is a kernel of truth in what you've said about the program which we can't discuss but we know it to be the program at issue in your hospital visit to the attorney general, the path to that kernel of truth is so convoluted and is so contrary to the plain import of what you said, that I, really, at this point have no choice but to believe that you intended to deceive us and to lead us or mislead us away from the dispute that the deputy attorney general subsequently brought to our attention. So you may act as if he's behaving, you know, in a crazy way to even think this, but at least count two of us and take it seriously. When we first spoke sometime ago, we talked about communications about cases between your office and the White House. In that context ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt4 Part 4 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales takes the oath and makes a statement. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: LEAHY: Thank you very much. And I might mention Senator Specter has requested a hearing on OxyContin. And I think he's absolutely right on that. We will have one, at your request. Mr. Attorney General, please stand and raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you will give at this time will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? GONZALES: I do. LEAHY: Go ahead, Mr. Attorney General. GONZALES: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. LEAHY: I should note before you start that there will be a series of votes around 10:20 and I'll consult with Senator Specter how best to continue during that time. At most, we will try to limit the break. Go ahead. GONZALES: I understand, Mr. Chairman. I do have the great pleasure to work with over 100000 dedicated public servants at the Department of Justice. I admire the dedication to pursue justice for all Americans. GONZALES: The department's many accomplishments are, in reality, their accomplishments. As attorney general, I have worked with these fine men and women to keep our country safe from terrorists, our neighborhoods safe from violent crime and our children safe ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt8 Part 8 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Kohl questions Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: LEAHY: Thank you very much. Senator Kohl? KOHL: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Attorney General, the detention center at Guantanamo Bay continues to harm our image around the world. There's growing consensus on this. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates told the House Committee, quote, "I came to this job thinking that Guantanamo Bay should be closed." KOHL: According to press reports, Secretary of State Rice has also supported efforts within the administration to close Guantanamo. And former Secretary of State Colin Powell said, quote, "If it was up to me, I would close Guantanamo -- not tomorrow, but this afternoon." Last year even the president himself recognized that Guantanamo has been the focus of international criticism and he said, I quote, "I'd like to, quote, 'close Guantanamo.'" Recent press reports have disclosed that efforts are under way in the administration to do that. According to the New York Times, however, these efforts, quote, "were rejected after Attorney General Gonzales and some other government lawyers expressed strong objections." So where are you on this? Do you think that we should close Guantanamo? GONZALES: I wish we could close Guantanamo. I'm with everyone ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt5 Part 5 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Chairman Patrick Leahy begins the questioning. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: LEAHY: Thank you, Mr. Attorney General. And your full statement, of course, will be made part of the record. We have documents that we have not in answer to a request made by this and other committees, but obtained through Freedom of Information Act lawsuits. They indicate that you received reports in 2005 and 2006 of violations in connection with the Patriot Act, abuses of national security letters. The violations apparently included unauthorized surveillance, illegal searches and improper collection of data. LEAHY: But when you testified before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in April of 2005, you sought to create the impression that Americans' civil liberties and privacies were being effectively safeguarded and respected. And you said, and I quote, "The track record established over the past three years has demonstrated the effectiveness of the safeguards of civil liberties put in place when the act was passed." Then I sent you written questions. And earlier this month, you responded about when you first learned of problems with national security letters. But in those responses, you didn't mention these earlier reports of problems. So my question is this ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt20 Part 20 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Dick Durbin's questions to Alberto Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: DURBIN: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Attorney General. There are many controversial issues that have been raised in this hearing: warrantless wiretapping, the political dismissal of US attorneys and the like. I think that this administration and your tenure as attorney general will be haunted in history by another issue, and that's the issue of torture. DURBIN: It is the reason I couldn't vote for your confirmation, the role that you played as counsel to the president in saying that we as a nation did not have to follow the torture statute and the provisions of the Geneva Conventions. Now, last Friday, President Bush signed an executive order interpreting Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions for the purposes of CIA secret detention and interrogation techniques. The executive order rejected your earlier position and acknowledges that the CIA must follow applicable law, including Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, the torture statute and the McCain torture amendment, which I was happy to cosponsor. Do you now agree that Common Article 3 applies to all detainees held by the United States? GONZALES: What I can say is is that certainly Common ...
  • David Drummond testifies before House Judiciary Committee David Drummond, Google's Senior Vice President of Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer, testifies before the House Judiciary Committee Antitrust Task Force at a July 15, 2008 hearing about competition and the Google-Yahoo! ad agreement. Topics of discussion include how the agreement benefits users, advertisers, and publishers, and the competitive nature of the online advertising business.
  • Federal Judiciary Careers: Court Interpreter Language skills are prized in the federal courts. Highly qualified interpreters in court proceedings involving non-English speakers help ensure that justice is carried out fairly for defendants and other stakeholders. Learn more about working for the federal Judiciary at www.uscourts.gov
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt10 Part 10 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Dianne Feinstein questions Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: FEINSTEIN: Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Attorney General, I've sat here and listened particularly to the opening comment of the chairman and the ranking member, and in my time in the Senate, I have never heard comments quite like that coming from both sides of the aisle. And then I listened to your response, which was nonresponsive which went into something about FISA, unrelated to anything that had been said. I don't think you understand what's happening in the Department of Justice, the diminution of credibility, integrity. It's almost as if the walls were actually crumbling on this huge department. FEINSTEIN: And I listen to you. And nothing gets answered directly. Everything is obfuscated. You can't tell me that you went up to see Mr. Comey for any other reason other than to reverse his decision about the terrorist surveillance program. That's clearly the only reason you would go to see the attorney general in intensive care. GONZALES: May I respond to that? FEINSTEIN: Yes, you may. GONZALES: OK. You're right. This is an extraordinary event. But we were confronting extraordinary circumstances where we had been advised that something that the department had ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt15 Part 15 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse questions Alberto Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: WHITEHOUSE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Gonzales, just before our little break, you indicated, in describing your reason for visiting the stricken attorney general in his hospital room was to alert him to the change in the Department of Justice view of the program at issue. And you testified that Attorney General Ashcroft -- and these are the words that I wrote down -- quote, "Authorized these activities for over two years." Is it your testimony, under oath, that Attorney General Ashcroft was read into and authorized the program at issue for two years prior to your visit to him in that hospital? GONZALES: I want to be very careful here, because it's fairly complicated. What I can say is I'm referring to intelligence activities that existed for a period of over two years and what we were asking the Department of Justice to do was -- which they had approved and what we... WHITEHOUSE: "They had approved" I guess is the point that I'm getting at. GONZALES: General Ashcroft, yes. WHITEHOUSE: You're saying that Attorney General Ashcroft... GONZALES: Yes. WHITEHOUSE: ... had authorized this program for over two years prior to that day... GONZALES: General Ashcroft had ...
  • Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt6 Part 6 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. First half of Senator Arlen Specter questions to Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: SPECTER: Let me move quickly through a series of questions -- there's a lot to cover -- starting with the issue that Mr. Comey raises. You said, quote, "There has not been any serious disagreement about the program." Mr. Comey's testimony was that Mr. Gonzales began to discuss why they were there, to seek approval, and he then says, quote, "I was very upset. I was angry. I thought I had just witnessed an effort to take advantage of a very sick man." SPECTER: First of all, Mr. Attorney General, what credibility is left for you when you say there's no disagreement and you're party to going to the hospital to see Attorney General Ashcroft under sedation to try to get him to approve the program? GONZALES: The disagreement that occurred, and the reason for the visit to the hospital, Senator, was about other intelligence activities. It was not about the terrorist surveillance program that the president announced to the American people. Now, I would like the opportunity... SPECTER: Mr. Attorney General, do you expect us to believe that? GONZALES: Well, may I have the opportunity to talk about another very important meeting in connection with the hospital visit that ...
  • Annie Duke - Judiciary Hearing on Internet Gaming House of Judiciary Committee Hearing on Internet Gaming on 11/14/2007.(Part 7 of 22). For complete details on the hearing go to judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=396
  • David Drummond testifies before Senate Judiciary Committee David Drummond, Google's Senior Vice President of Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer, testifies before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights at a September 27, 2007 hearing about online advertising and Google's acquisition of DoubleClick. Topics of discussion include how Google's advertising network benefits consumers, the competitive nature of the online advertising business, and the high importance Google places on protecting users' privacy.
  • Roy Beck Testimony to Senate Judiciary Committee - June 3, 2009 Roy Beck's testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding S.424, which would provide green cards for domestic partners.
  • Ashton Judiciary Square - Luxury Apartments Ashton Judiciary Square Luxury Apartment Homes features one bedroom, two bedroom, and three bedroom apartments for rent in Washington DC. Up the street from the US Capitol Building, Ashton Judiciary Square is steps from Chinatown, the Verizon Center, the Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery, and the Judiciary Square Metro station. Ashton Judiciary Square features panoramic views of the US Capitol, the Washington Monument, and the DC skyline as well as offering a premier fitness club, dedicated concierge, and a controlled entry access parking garage with dedicated spots. Homes at Ashton Judiciary Square offer spacious living areas complete with window walls, beautiful hardwood and travertine flooring, an open kitchen with European style cabinetry and stainless steel appliances, extra large walk-in closets, and spa inspired bathrooms with soothing soaking tubs. With easy access to I-395 and the Judiciary Square Metro, you can access the entire DC Metro Area in minutes from Ashton Judiciary Square. Schedule your tour today. bit.ly 750 3rd Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Ph: 866-648-3159 AshtonJudiciarySquare@newhome1.com
  • Kenya Judiciary system, a tool for the big man As debate on whether a local tribunal should be set up to try post election violence suspects rages, attention is shifting to the judiciary. Many of those rejecting the local tribunal option argue that the countrys judicial system cannot be trusted. And as Ntvs Emmanuel Juma reports, the countrys criminal justice system is largely considered to be a tool at the mercy and the service of the big man.
  • James Comey testifies before Senate Judiciary Former Deputy Attorney General James Comey testifies that Alberto Gonzales, as White House counsel, tried to get AG John Ashcroft, critically ill on his hospital sickbed, to approve an NSA program the Justice Department had serious legal doubts about
  • Raila opposes Kibaki's judiciary list www.ntv.co.ke Prime minister Raila Odinga has dismissed the nominations made by President Kibaki for three key Judiciary appointments, claiming he was not consulted as required by the Constitution. The premier warned of dire consequences in the reforms agenda, if Kibaki does not rescind his decision. But in a quick rejoinder, President Kibaki, through government spokesman, maintained that he had consulted his coalition partner on this matter.
  • Judiciary commission rejects nominees The storm and uproar over the appointment of the judicial nominees continues to deepen with the key judicial service commission now calling for the withdrawal of the names. In what amounts to a major setback for president Kibaki, the commission is asking the two principals to put the country first as they make a fresh start to the process. this came as one of the nominees lawyer Kioko Kilukumi appeared to accept the nomination when he withdrew his representation of William Ruto in the 96 million shillings fraud case.
  • Senate Judiciary Committee w/Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt22 Part 22 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Senator Russ Feingold's questions to Alberto Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: FEINGOLD: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will be shortly introducing a resolution to censure the president and senior members of his administration for undermining the rule of law. From authorizing an illegal wiretapping program to claiming the power to detain US citizens indefinitely without charging them, I think this administration has shown disdain for the Constitution and the laws of the land. You have played a central role in that effort, so I'd like to give you an opportunity to defend your actions. With respect to the NSA's illegal wiretapping program, last year in hearings before this committee and the House Judiciary Committee, you stated that, quote, "There has not been any serious disagreement about the program that the president has confirmed," unquote, that any disagreement that did occur, quote, "did not deal with the program that I am here testifying about today," unquote and that, quote, "The disagreement that existed does not relate to the program the president confirmed in December to the American people," unquote. FEINGOLD: Two months ago, you sent a letter to me and other members of this committee defending that testimony and asserting that it ...
  • Jena Six Case House Judiciary Committee Hearing US Attorney Donald Washington & the Justice Department are on the hot seat. The US Justice Department is questioned for its "inability" to bring hate charges against the students who hung nooses under a "white" tree on school campus in Jena, La. In this segment, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minnesota) is doing the questioning.
  • DOJ-GATE: Monica Goodling Testifies @ House Judiciary Goodling's opening statement
  • Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales-7/24/07 Pt7 Part 7 of 32 Senate Judiciary Committee with Alberto Gonzales. Second half of Senator Arlen Specter questions to Gonzales. 7/24/07 KEEP IN MIND: Gonzales was given each and every question he would be asked beforehand. Nothing was a surprise - there was absolutely NO "GOTCHA!" Transcript of this portion of the hearing: SPECTER: I'm not going to pursue that question, Mr. Attorney General, because I see it's hopeless. It's got nothing to do with your recusal. You're the attorney general, and you're also a lawyer. And we're dealing with a very fundamental controversy, where the president is exerting executive authority under executive privilege and the Congress is exerting constitutional authority for oversight. And we're trying to take it to court. The court decides when that conflict exists. It's got nothing to do with, necessarily, the US attorneys who were asked to resign. Let me move ahead to another subject, see if I get an answer here. You have a conflict of interest on the matter involving the resignations of the US attorneys. GONZALES: Yes. I'm recused for that. SPECTER: Does the president have a conflict of interest in deciding whether or not to allow a contempt citation to go forward to a former White House counsel, Harriet Miers? GONZALES: Senator, I am not going to answer that question. Again, you're talking about -- asking me questions about a matter in which I am recused. I'm not going to answer that question. SPECTER: Well, let's see if somehow, somewhere, we ...
  • Nicole Wong Testifies before Senate Judiciary Committee Nicole Wong, Deputy General Counsel for Google, testifies before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law at a May 20, 2008 hearing on Global Internet Freedom. Topics of discussion include Google's commitment to freedom of expression, our efforts to meet challenges posed by legal and cultural barriers to the free flow of information, and the role of governments in reducing Internet censorship and promoting free expression.
  • Jamie Leigh Jones Testifies Before House Judiciary Committee House Judiciary Committee hearings on the Jamie Leigh Jones gang rape by Halliburton/KBR employees

Blogs & Forum
blogs and forums about judiciary

  • “Second Judiciary Committee Hearing on Concussions. 4 January 2010 Tagged: Congressional Judiciary Committee, Congressman John Conyers, Dave Pear, Do No”
    — Congressional Judiciary Committee - Dave Pear's Blog,

  • “Published under: Real Time Blog | ***uality Education | abstinence-only education | cristina page | gay marriage | Judiciary | McCain | *** | *** harassment | Supreme Court | ***agers ***s. Comments are rated by readers on a scale from 1 to 5. Comments with a rating of 2 or less are hidden”
    Judiciary | ,

  • “Webfeed. Afua Hirsch's law blog + Judiciary. Monday 22 November 2010 Find out more in our blog post. Last 24 hours. 1. Lawyers should right-size their love of”
    — Afua Hirsch's law blog + Judiciary | Law | ,

  • “law tagged. Forum. GCSE Revision Materials. Shop. Blog. Forum. Study Notes & Quizzes. Blog. Study Notes. Forum. Blog. Blog. Revision Materials. Blog. Revision Materials. Blog. History Shop. Forum. Quizzes & Activities. Judicial diversity. Monday, July 05, 2010. by Andy Howells”
    judiciary - entries tagged judiciary from the Law blog, tutor2

  • “Tags: budget, Judiciary. WASHINGTON - Although the final amount was less than requested, approval of $6.9 billion in appropriations for the federal judiciary in fiscal year 2010”
    Judiciary " Lawyers USA Online,

  • “The House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hold a hearing on Castle Doctrine contact the members of the judiciary committee to support the measure”
    — Articles tagged Judiciary Committee at PAFOA Blog,

  • “Home->Main Forum->State and Other Courts->Virginia->Judiciary Worst Judge. Complete a Survey. This forum contains subforums for visiting, senior, retired and former judges. Enter here to post”
    Judiciary Forum Virginia,,

  • “Above the Law founder David Lat actually entered the legal blogosphere in 2004 as the anonymous "Article III Groupie" via the legal blog Underneath Their Robes. The blog continued after he came out in a November 2005 New Yorker interview, but”
    — Underneath Their Robes Blog Back on Federal Judiciary's Case,

  • “The Hill is a congressional newspaper that publishes daily when Congress is in session, with a special focus on business and lobbying, political campaigns and goings on on Capitol Hill”
    — The Judiciary - The Hill's Pundits Blog,

Keywords
related keywords for judiciary